|
|||||||
| Rods Get the goss on what’s hot, and what’s not... |

![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Samurai reaction 181
Toying with the idea of replacing my 101 with a 181, much difference between the 2 rods. looking for a little more backbone and stiffness, using for casting sx40 type lures. Opinions appreciated thanks.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Geeze this got a lot of interest.
For those interested I pulled the pin on a 181 and it is an awesome little rod, it has the backbone that I always felt the 101 was missing. landed a 5 kg carp on it this arvo and the rod handled the fish no problems at all. I had the chance to play with a new 201 and 252 in the shop and I was really impressed with the newer reactions in comparison to the old ones, they seem lighter and crisper. I think another samurai will end up in the kit by the end of the year. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just wondered if you ever used the previous model 201 at all and how the 181 compares to it.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have the older 201 , the new 181 feels lighter, they have a similar amount of power down low. The 181 runs smaller guides which I think reduces some weight which is noticeable in the tip section of the rod. Hard to explain but the newer reactions feel crisper without loosing the softness.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
OK. Thanks. Sounds like a great rod.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Love mine! So crisp! Love the new grips too!
__________________
Cheers Jules. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
So what do you see as the differences between the 201 and the 181.
If I am looking for a plastics rod what would sway me to one rod over the other?
__________________
Supporting The Jig Man |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Some interesting history on how the 181 came about:
Quote:
__________________
Supporting The Jig Man |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|