|
Bream Anglers Tavern Drop in here if you're just surfing with a beer in your hand. Good place to just hang out... |
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
#121
|
||||
|
||||
I think you should just leave it as is. The article may not be an accurate representation of the actual top 10 lures and the writer may not have said that the results were taken from a forum from people who may have never even caught a bream before. I havent read the article and am just going by whats been said on here.. I still dont see the need for you to get so involved because you didnt receive a bit of free advertising. Im suprised that some lure companies were left out. Jackall for one. But dont see them whingeing about it. Once again I think you may be better off just letting this one slide and concentrating on selling your lures. Cheers |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It's not about Zipbaits vs the World its about a poorly put together article where the writer got it wrong at our expense, ultimately you decide but can only state the facts as they appear to me and I don't think anyone can deny it because it's all there to count yourself if you please, maybe another one of those my generation things but questioning results that are incorrect is my right I think. You the reader can now make your own decision and if you wish to believe that the article is correct or not and if I hadn't brought it to the attention of others then I guess some may have taken these results as being true when they're not. Why defend when there is an admission that they got it wrong? Mark Last edited by Hyper Tackle; 27-01-2011 at 05:38 AM. |
#123
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Check my avatar if you want to see a Bream with a Chubby Mark, Chubbies have various different models, sx40's have a couple of models, most soft plastics have different models (sizes), shirasus have different models, so to use that as an arguement that Zipbaits was misrepresented in the poll, while being sowewhat correct is also correct to alot of lure brands so I would not get a bee in your bonnet over this |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
If this is the case still done badly and would like to see another writer try and do it properly perhaps another mag might take up the challenge and if it were me a simple voting ballot slip with a blank 1-10 to be handed to anglers at tournaments and then collected and do this around the country would be a far more accurate representation IMO and also as people will and did in this case specify a particular variations of models then this should be collated otherwise none of us will ever know exactly Mark Last edited by Hyper Tackle; 27-01-2011 at 08:05 AM. |
#125
|
||||
|
||||
1. Atomic 38 crank deep
2. Atomic 38 crank medium 3. Jackall Chubbie Deep 4. Zipbaits Khamsin 5. SX 43F 6. Gulp! 2" shrimp Pepper prawn 7. Gulp! 3" minow Pepper prawn 8. Powerbait 3" minow pearl water mellon 9. Powerbait 2" Hawg 10.Tiemco soft cicarter Black |
#126
|
|||
|
|||
it might be time to start reading the tea leaves and see that everyone thinks you're over-reacting about a little poll in a fishing mag. You're acting like there's some absolute truth to all this, when its clear there are a thousand ways people can interpret the question and a thousand more ways the poll could be dodgy. People aren't stupid - they can see that and take what they want from it. Its doing you more harm than good to keep going on about it. Still think that the funniest thing is that you haven't even read the article but continue going on about it.
Last edited by Cortinaboy; 27-01-2011 at 09:10 AM. |
|
|